Archive for category Customer Marketing

Predictions or Wishful Thinking and Going out on a Limb for 2010

Much to my mother’s relief after YEARS of complaints about the loss of a single telecommunications provider, I accurately predicted that the dizzying array of long distance provider choices would be relatively short-lived post-divestiture of the Baby Bells/AT&T.  Those of us mature enough (read middle-aged) to have survived the years of long distance provider ballots,  recall the touting of freedom of choice but an experience with multiple service providers and the consequent bills, different customer relations contact numbers, and frustration that has been minimized by the demise of the early alternative providers and the accounting mishaps of MCI, et al.  I offer this example not only as a complex lession in B2C socio-economics, but as a metaphor for similar trends of expansion and contraction that I see in the customer relationship/social media and networking applications and use of today.   (I also offer it as tongue-in-cheek proof that at least once in twenty years, my predictions have been accurate! :) )

In a much shorter span of time, due largely to the rapidity with which we can today adopt and reject different technologies and communications metaphors, I believe that 2010 will bring us some readjustment to the adoption and application of many of the social media and networking solutions available.   Businesses, their customers and various audiences, and the technology vendors that support our ability to relate have behaved like the proverbial children in a candy store as they deploy ways of internetworking in their customer relationship, sales and marketing channels.   We have been preaching that adopting and deploying social media and networking applications should be informed by an integrated marketing/sales/customer relations strategy; we should also have been coaching ourselves and our consumer-friends to do the same.   Today, faced with multiple devices and applications on each, all similarly poised to serve my communications needs and curiosity, I see 2010 as the year that some consolidation, re-prioritization, and merger/acquisition will take place due to the constraints of bandwidth, the natural fall-out of the success and failure of businesses who have quickly cobbled together competitive applications, and the maturity of our adoption of the same both in our professional and personal capacities.   With no further ado, but some nervous wincing, I offer the following general and some specific predictions for 2010:

General Trends:

1. Organizations who have been dabbling their toes in social media channels for customer outreach will either be the best practice model or retract their offerings completely.  The speed with which our effectiveness in communicating using these channels is judged by our audience dictates that their is very little-time to privately fine-tune our approach.   Missteps are instantly reported and best practices lauded.   We have been cautioning our clients to strategize first; “Tweet” last and those that have adopted this approach are much more successful, even as they adjust it, than those who jumped on the Twitter, Facebook Page, blog, etc. bandwagon only to find they had little to say or had not developed the infrastructure to support their efforts.   I have been personally “testing” and rating the efforts of some companies in the telecommunications, high-tech, and consumer products verticals and will continue to do so.   Even in the past year, the gap between success and failure has been very black and white.   Those that dabbled without a transparent, honest and open approach to soliciting participation and feedback have dramatically reduced their presence or are gone; those that set strategy and have flexibly incorporated the feedback of their participants are still going strong.   Most importantly as is mentioned in this article, “real time is not fast enough”: 4 Social Media Trends for Business in 2010 (pamorama.net)

2.  A leader in social media measurements and metrics WILL emerge (this may be definitely in the wishful thinking category).   We have played with a number of applications in an attempt to measure our own effectiveness in our social media outreach and our clients and colleagues have certainly expressed this as their biggest challenge and need for 2010.   A plethora of applications and practices have evolved over the past year, but no one seems to have demonstrated the ability to provide service to both the SMB and large business marketplace.   VisibleTechnologies, Radian6, and ViralHeat all offer a  suite of solutions that seem to provide the breadth of measurement for which many have clamored, but we think that a vendor that has the benchstrength of SEO and traditional collateral metrics blended with the ability to monitor the pulse of sentiments expressed in our emerging channels will be a front-runner.   Another key success factor will be their ability to offer a tiered-pricing structure that is accessible to the smaller business.

3. Bandwidth issues will force resolution.   It is clear that the FCC is facing some enormous challenges in the spectrum arena, pushed by our adoption of mobile applications and our increasingly untethered approach to communication and conversation.   The “but of course” piece of this prediction is that the FCC will make a decision about alternative and additional sources of spectrum (for those of you inclined to take a look at the history, see this study: http://www.reg-markets.org/admin/authorpdfs/redirect-safely.php?fname=../pdffiles/working_01_021075290780.pdf The more intuitive piece is that our limited bandwidth and the growing frustration of consumers and business mobile application users must drive our own strategic thinking and prioritation regarding use of solutions that blend the best of our CRM, SFA, and social networking tools on our mobile devices.   Those applications that offer the best-of-breed that shares a piece of all of these will certainly emerge as icons on my Blackberry.

4. Congress will consider additional privacy legislation.   Knowledge service provision is the polite term for the complex data-mining that both corporations and individuals practice as conduct predictive analyses of our consumers’ and networks behaviors and attributes (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_market).  Consumers concern for the privacy of their on-line personas (which seems paradoxical) will drive politicians at the local, state, and federal levels to contemplate additional protective measures,   http://www.cedmagazine.com/News-Congress-online-privacy-legislation-061909.aspx.   Most importantly, this concern of our constituents and attention of politicians should drive us as businesses to be ever more vigilant in our transparency and honest expression of our internetworking intentions, lest we suffer backlash from our audience and failure of our attempts long before legislation steps in.

To return to my opening anecdotal story, the plethora of choices that face us as businesses and consumers and the speed with which our internetworking communications are judged and evaluated will drive a much faster shift in applications provision, vendor consolidation and acquisition, and availability of broad content creation, publishing and measurements suites than we experienced post-divestiture.    If a single-bill and customer contact 800 number drove a return to a single telecommunications provider over a ten year period, shrink that consumer reaction and vendor response time metphor by 1/10th and you will understand the core of our predictions for 2010.   Perhaps a more concrete synthesis of this post is provided by my “Going Out On A Limb” prediction for 2010:

Twitter will be acquired by ?. The names of the players may change, but my thinking is that in Twitter we have found a truly facile, effective and immediate channel for communicating with a very diverse and huge potential audience.  The service and its users are self-regulating and successful users are quickly noted and its open approach to associated applications has resulted in a myriad of options for uploading content, measuring folowers, RT’s, etc.   We think that an acquistion by a company who has the content creation, editing, and publishing benchstrength, combined with an understanding of social media and networking measurement challenges will purchase Twitter and embed the channel with some native content and measurement utilities.   The odds-makers are predicting that this will be Microsoft, but we are thinking that the acquirer may be someone that is not in the search engine/networking/social media space but a more traditional collateral application company.   The debate at Cubed Consulting continues as to who this might be but we’d love for your to weigh in with your names!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]


Bookmark and Share

, , , , ,

No Comments

Welcome Lisa Hoesel

Cubed Consulting (@cubedconsulting) is proud and excited to announce that Lisa Hoesel-Peters (@lhoesel) is the newest member of the Cubed Consulting team.   Lisa has over twenty years of customer relationship, reference and technology strategic management, consulting, and execution in verticals as diverse as financial, technology, and non-profit.   Lisa’s keen insight into the variety of ways that businesses can create compelling and sustainable conversations with clients, prospects and other audiences is informed by the breadth and depth of her experience as much as her avid and enthusiastic participation in social media and networking activities and analysis.  Lisa’s expertise in the Small, Medium and Emerging Business markets will be a welcome compliment to Cubed Consulting. Lisa’s will serve as Director of Social Networking Strategy and can be contacted on lisa@cubedconsulting.com.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]


Bookmark and Share

, , , , , , ,

No Comments

12 “Days” of Customer Thank You Ideas that Become Gifts to Your Organization

Please pardon the seasonal theme, particularly as we at CubedConsulting believe that relationship sustenance begins, continues, and hopefully never ends with creative and comprehensive ways of acknowledging your clients and receiving testimonial and reference collateral in return throughout the year, but it “tis the season”…   If you can catch your breath at this time of year, we at least hope that you may have time to give some thought to the introduction of innovation to your customer reference and relationship programs using some of these  ideas:

1.  Send your Top 100 Clients a Flip Mino and ask them to record and upload a clip about your services and solutions.

2. Create a YouTube Channel and record holiday greetings from key customer service contact people.  Film people you may not traditionally consider but have important customer contact roles.

3. Offer to exchange audio testimonials with vendors who are also clients.

4. Write a post for your corporate blog that singles out top clients and charitable activities in which they have participated or interesting accomplishments of theirs this past year.  Don’t tie yourself to information that is solely related to their relationship with you:  just acknowledge them.

5. Add rotating refreshed holiday greetings to your email signatures that single out indiviudals, companies, etc. with which/whom you do business.   Create a template that your sales, marketing, customer organization can change out every day throughout the holidays (and then create one for the rest of the year)!

6. Announce your plans to launch a customer community blog with “insider” access to development roadmaps, key technical personnel, your CEO, etc.  Offer a “room” or discussion thread that is not monitored by you.

7. Run a contest asking for videos of the funniest, non-traditional (but appropriate) use of your services and solutions and offer the winner a free pass to your next user conference.

8. Run a contest (with similar rules) offering the winner fifteen minutes of telephone access to your CEO.

9. Offer to include your clients’ corporate charity of choice and information about donation and participation in all of your January 2010 promotional collateral.

10.  Assign a top client to an employee with whom they traditionally do not interact.  Ask your employee to make a phone call or send an email thanking them for their business this year.   This might demonstrate that your entire organization, not just their account and sales representatives, are committed to the relationship.

11. Add thank-you messages to all of your social media channels and make them personal.   We expect that you may have sent our some holiday greetings, but use the global reach of SMN and the ability to personalize to extend this effort.

12.  Take a breath.  Give yourself and your clients a break by promising that you won’t ask them to take any more reference calls or be interviewed for a case study, press release, or anything else until next year!  :)

 Our sincerest wishes for a safe, relaxing, and joyous holiday season to all of you!

 

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]


Bookmark and Share

, , , , ,

No Comments

Chickens and Eggs in Social Media Execution

As much as we love technology at Cubed Consulting, our mission is to help our clients develop comprehensive, appropriate, measurable, attainable, and sustainable customer relationship and marketing strategies. Although we enthusiastically Tweet, do status updates, ask to connect in Linkedin, and even create surveys in Facebook; we are ever cognizant that the selection of which e-playground we choose for our outreach and relationship-building is driven first by a clear understanding of our business goals and objectives.   We have worked for and with both small and Fortune 100 clients who have adopted an approach to social media execution without examination of their purpose or alignment with customer relationship, sales, and marketing plans and quite frankly, made a mess of things.   We spend our time helping you understand and articulate your goals first and then assist in the selection of the appropriate social media tools and measurements; posting frequency and content; and integration with other strategies, applications, and efforts.    There may be some consistent truisms to corporate social media interaction, but you will never hear “Everybody MUST have a Twitter account” from us.   You will get recommendations about specific tools after we analyze how best to meet your stated needs.   To illustrate this approach, let’s look at a very skeletal example:

Objective:  Create more corporate/brand awareness in new communities.

Tactics:

1) Traditional marketing outreach and collateral to new communities:

2) Leveraging existing or new social media outlets to establish relationships and create conversation.

a) Join New Groups in Facebook, Linkedin, etc. applications that map to new demographic profile.

b) Use Twitter Lists, hash tags, etc. to gauge and generate interest in solutions, company etc.

c) Produce audio/video/other collateral relevant to message and launch.

d) Etc.

My point is not to delineate the steps of our engagement process, but to demonstrate that the selection of tools, applications, and approach FOLLOW not DEFINE our social media decision-making.   If the objective were to gauge interest in a new solution or product, we may not advise establishing a Facebook or Linkedin presence until the research around communities of interest had determined that those were the appropriate venues.

I’m looking forward to “meeting” many of you and exchanging thoughts!

Regards,

Lisa

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]


Bookmark and Share

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment

We Have to Change the Way We Change

Anybody who has ever owned an aquarium knows that you can only change a certain amount of the water at a time without upsetting the delicate bacteriological balance that keeps ammonia and nitrate levels safe for the fish. This principle might also be applied to organizations. How often have we seen sweeping changes in organizations that fail to address the issues that they have been targeted at, yet cause huge disruption and uncertainty, which eventually ripples through to the customer with unintended consequences.

In an insightful article by social entrepreneur Zenna Atkins in the Guardian online at http://bit.ly/2Eryg5, the author advises against the “big bang” approach to change, in favor of the incremental approach. Atkins argues that it is better to have multiple listening points, both internally and externally that enable an organization to be constantly aware of what is going on. This provides the necessary intelligence that allows the organization to evolve gradually to keep pace with ever changing customer needs. Listening posts might include customer and employee surveys, social media (blogs, customer forums, Twitter etc.), focus groups and direct conversations.

The bottom line – establish listening posts internally and externally. Introduce change in continuous small increments to allow your organization to become accustomed to each new state. Use the same listening posts to evaluate the success or failure of the change. Your customers and employees will be glad that you listened and acted.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]


Bookmark and Share

, , , , , , ,

No Comments

The 3 Keys to Social Media Success

Why are you on Facebook?  What do you hope to accomplish by using Twitter?  Do you have a plan for all those audio and video testimonials that you are creating?  Does your overall web presence clearly communicate how your customers can (and should) interact with you through each channel?   If not, don’t read any more of this blog post.  Go figure out why you are doing what you are doing then come back and figure out how to make the most of your Social Media Marketing efforts to achieve your goals.

For the rest of us, the recipe is actually simple.  It’s the preparation and execution that can get complex.  We get caught up in all the possibilities that the web and Social Media offer us.  In fact, when you read this blog post, don’t read too into it.  Don’t try to get fancy – just stick to the basics.

1.  Be Genuine – Above all, be yourself (as a person and as a corporation).  Remember, that our customers are very smart and they know when we are not being real.  Our customers connect with us online so they can engage us in a personal, candid dialogue.  Remember, if they want to read the polished Press Release they will pick it up off the Wire.  Give them more – don’t just tell them that you are great (even if you are) but instead show them what makes you so great.  Maybe it’s the great people you have that work with you.  Maybe it’s the high value you put on customers.  Maybe it’s your quirky approach to business.  Whatever it is, don’t be afraid to show the real you.  (I feel like your Mom giving you a pep talk)

SIDE NOTE: It’s also ok to share the bad with the good – it demonstrates candor and establishes credibility.

2.  Provide Value – What do your customers want?  They may want discounts (who doesn’t).  They may want information.  They may want to be heard.  They may want to laugh.  Whatever they want, give it to them and give it often.  More often than not, especially in the B2B space, the answer is not just money.  Trust me, it’s not just about money – it is about a mutually beneficial relationship.  In the end, Value is different for every customer and every organization.  Pair what your customers want with what you can offer but figure this out quickly because, without this, your customers have no reason to engage you and, worse, they have no reason to recommend you.

3.  Interact – We have spent more than a century providing static content to our customers and prospects.  Our marketing message has been one way and we never knew, for sure, if anyone was listening to it.  Social Media is changing all of that.  We now have the ability to engage in conversations with our customers in ways we couldn’t before.  We can get feedback and adjust accordingly in an instant.  Social Media empowers our customers to evangelize our products and services.  The best part of all of this is that our customers actually want to interact with us online.  We, as a people, are spending so much more time in Social Networks than ever before.  Take advantage of this trend and engage your audience and interact with them through the channels that they are already comfortable with.

In Social Media, to be successful, you don’t need a persona, you don’t need to bribe, and you don’t need to be polished – but you do need a plan.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]


Bookmark and Share

, , , , , , ,

No Comments

Three Degrees of Influence

Many years ago my father-in-law took his family on a day trip to Muir Beach, just North of San Francisco. It was a very warm day and parking was hard to come by. He observed a lot of cars parked in the red zone on the road approaching the beach, so he also parked there, figuring that because so many others had done it, it was somehow OK. He was livid when he returned to the car later to discover a parking ticket and was no less livid when he noticed that everybody else had gotten ticketed too.

How our behaviors are influenced by others, is the subject of one of the most fascinating and informative books I have ever read – Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives by Nicholas A. Christakis and James H. Fowler. In the book the authors present the scientific evidence of how we not only influence our friends, but also those that are three degrees of separation away from us, in other words – our friends’ friends and the friends of our friends’ friends. Their book examines not only epidemics of disease, but also suicides, politics, happiness, sadness and many other human experiences.

The book offers interesting insights, based on real science on how ideas and beliefs can go viral. These insights into human behavior can shed light on troubling events such as asset bubbles or even genocide. It seems that our primeval need to belong in groups (who would want to be an outcast when cannibalism and human sacrifice was commonly practiced) can overwhelm our rationality and our morality with terrible consequences. The good news is that the effect works in reverse also so that positive outcomes such as altruism and social justice can also be contagious. The case in Winston-Salem, North Carolina where 44 Liberian orphans were adopted by various local families is a wonderful example.

In Chapter 8 of the book, the authors describe how our behavior in virtual communities mimics our behavior in the real world. Apparently, attractive avatars in Second Life are more confident than plain avatars – regardless of the sex and looks of the real person who “owns” the avatar. In the popular online game “World of Warcraft”, a virtual disease spread in much the same way as a real disease might spread. These findings offer new avenues of experimentation for social scientists exploring the human condition.

The key takeaway is that each of us has influence over others, even over those that we have never met, but who are within three degrees of separation. If we are depressed, we can depress others. If we are happy we can, with little effort on our part, cause happiness in others. This book should be required reading in schools and colleges. Perhaps understanding our propensity to follow the crowd and the potential negative outcomes, might prevent some of our more destructive behaviors.

 

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]


Bookmark and Share

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment

Customer Reference Programs Have to Change

Customer Reference Programs, as we know them, are going away!  There, I said it.  It had to be said.

I’ve been seeing a shift in Customer Reference Programs for some time now.  More and more of the traditional functions of the Reference Program seem to overlap with too many other groups within the organization and the core value seems to have faded.  Furthermore, the importance of having a dedicated team to act as the conduit of Reference information seems almost antiquated especially with the explosion of Social Media.  This reality has played out in the economic downturn, which has proved to be unkind to many Customer Reference Programs who have seen a reduction or, in some cases, a complete shutdown.

This isn’t news.  We have been seeing the signs for some time now.  In fact, as early as January 2007, Forrester Analyst, Jeremiah Owyang recognized the disruptive impact of Social Media on Corporate Customer Reference  Programs in a blog post.  It’s well worth the read. Essentially, the availability of product and service reviews in social media often provides prospective customers with ample information to make a decision.

As we have encouraged our customers to join our communities, they, too, have become active in other online communities and often leverage those forums to communicate with eachother without our support.  In the same way, marketers must embrace New Media to engage with customers and prospects – it’s no longer an option.  If Customer Reference Programs want to survive or, even better, thrive, they need to leverage New Media to connect with and connect together our customers and prospects.  As always, take the time to build a proper strategy and select the vehicles that work best for your objectives.

How have you seen your Customer Reference program change in recent years?

 

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]


Bookmark and Share

, , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Understand International Variances in your Customer Surveys

One of the challenges I have struggled with when interpreting customer survey results is understanding why some countries give lower scores than others on the same questions – in particular in relation to product performance, which should be the same for all regions.  Most global companies divide the world into the following regions – NASA (North and South America), EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) and APAC (Asia-Pacific Region).  I have observed that on the same survey, the NASA region will score highest, followed by EMEA, followed by APAC. In one instance, the NASA based support management assumed that this indicated that they were doing a better job and there was pressure applied to the other regions support teams to close the gap. Having worked in both NASA and EMEA based service organizations, I have suspected that variances in results might be culture related. Furthermore, if I took the APAC results for a particular survey and looked only at results for Australia and New Zealand, these closely matched NASA results – suggesting that the APAC support team was doing as good a job as their NASA counterparts.

Recently, I discovered the work of Professor Geert Hofstede who has conducted ground-breaking studies of cultural differences.  Analyzing a large data base of employee values scores collected by IBM between 1967 and 1973 covering more than 70 countries, Prof. Hofstede developed a Framework for Assessing Culture that identifies five dimensions of culture that can impact and predict behavior.

Wikipedia summarizes the five dimensions as follows …

  • Low vs. High Power Distance –  the extent to which the less powerful members of institutions and organizations expect and accept that power is distributed unequally. Low power distance (e.g. Austria, Australia, Denmark, New Zealand) expect and accept power relations that are more consultative or democratic. People relate to one another more as equals regardless of formal positions. Subordinates are more comfortable with and demand the right to contribute to and critique the decision making of those in power. In High power distance countries (e.g. Malaysia), less powerful accept power relations that are more autocratic and paternalistic. Subordinates acknowledge the power of others simply based on where they are situated in certain formal, hierarchical positions. As such, the Power Distance Index Hofstede defines does not reflect an objective difference in power distribution, but rather the way people perceive power differences. In Europe, Power Distance tends to be lower in Northern countries and higher in Southern and Eastern parts. There seems to be an admittedly disputable correlation with predominant religions.

 

  • Individualism vs. collectivism – individualism is contrasted with collectivism, and refers to the extent to which people are expected to stand up for themselves and to choose their own affiliations, or alternatively act predominantly as a member of a life-long group or organization. Latin American cultures rank among the most collectivist in this category, while Anglo countries such as the U.S.A., Great Britain and Australia are the most individualistic cultures.

 

  • Masculinity vs. femininity – refers to the value placed on traditionally male or female values (as understood in most Western cultures). So called ‘masculine’ cultures value competitiveness, assertiveness, ambition, and the accumulation of wealth and material possessions, whereas feminine cultures place more value on relationships and quality of life. Japan is considered by Hofstede to be the most “masculine” culture (replaced by Slovakia in a later study), Sweden the most “feminine.” Anglo cultures are moderately masculine. As a result of the taboo on sexuality in many cultures, particularly masculine ones, and because of the obvious gender generalizations implied by Hofstede’s terminology, this dimension is often renamed by users of Hofstede’s work, e.g. to Quantity of Life vs. Quality of Life. Another reading of the same dimension holds that in ‘M’ cultures, the differences between gender roles are more dramatic and less fluid than in ‘F’ cultures

 

  • Uncertainty avoidance – reflects the extent to which members of a society attempt to cope with anxiety by minimizing uncertainty. Cultures that scored high in uncertainty avoidance prefer rules (e.g. about religion and food) and structured circumstances, and employees tend to remain longer with their present employer. Mediterranean cultures, Latin America, and Japan rank the highest in this category.

 

 

Michael Harris Bond and his collaborators subsequently found a fifth dimension which was initially called Confucian dynamism. Hofstede later incorporated this into his framework as:

  • Long vs. short term orientation – describes a society’s “time horizon,” or the importance attached to the future versus the past and present. In long term oriented societies, values include persistence (perseverance), ordering relationships by status, thrift, and having a sense of shame; in short term oriented societies, values include normative statements, personal steadiness and stability, protecting ones face, respect for tradition, and reciprocation of greetings, favors, and gifts. China, Japan and the Asian countries score especially high (long-term) here, with Western nations scoring rather low (short-term) and many of the less developed nations very low; China scored highest and Pakistan lowest.

 

The scores on the dimensions are available at Hofstede’s website.

In summary, although not without it’s detractors, Hofstede’s work remains the most exhaustive and scientific study of cultural differences to date. It presents compelling evidence that an individuals behavior is influenced by their cultural background and provides a predictive model based on the research. I have observed a similarity in survey responses from countries scoring high on the individualism/collectivism dimension.  I will certainly be leveraging Hofstedes work in future surveys to determine if this observation continues to hold true.

The key takeaways for customer experience and customer support managers are …

  1. Survey results should not be used to compare performance across geographic boundaries, without taking into account the cultural background of the respondent.
  2. Compare single country results to known benchmarks, if possible.
  3. Survey frequently to capture trends. Trending will give you a reliable indication of your organizations performance over time.

 

 

 

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]


Bookmark and Share

, , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

SAP UK Study finds that Customer Engagement is Key to Surviving Recession

The following appeared in an article posted at …

http://tinyurl.com/qrmxru

“Recent research by software provider SAP UK found that over 50 per cent of respondents are looking at a number of different technology channels to increase revenue.

A similar amount also claimed that focusing on customer engagement will be the key driver to surviving the downturn. “

Like most organizations, your company is likely engaging your customers through multiple channels, formal and informal, across different departments. This can cause the customer experience to be erratic and disjointed. Remember that the customer does not view your company as a collection of individuals or siloed departments, but very likely experiences your organization that way. Great customer experience requires a company wide strategy for all customer touchpoints. Based on the findings by SAP UK, many organizations are realizing this.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]


Bookmark and Share

, , , , , , , ,

No Comments