Archive for category Customer Marketing
Predictions or Wishful Thinking and Going out on a Limb for 2010
Posted by Lisa in 2010 Trends, Customer Experience, Customer Marketing, Integrated Marketing Strategy, Social Media Marketing on February 9th, 2010
Much to my mother’s relief after YEARS of complaints about the loss of a single telecommunications provider, I accurately predicted that the dizzying array of long distance provider choices would be relatively short-lived post-divestiture of the Baby Bells/AT&T. Those of us mature enough (read middle-aged) to have survived the years of long distance provider ballots, recall the touting of freedom of choice but an experience with multiple service providers and the consequent bills, different customer relations contact numbers, and frustration that has been minimized by the demise of the early alternative providers and the accounting mishaps of MCI, et al. I offer this example not only as a complex lession in B2C socio-economics, but as a metaphor for similar trends of expansion and contraction that I see in the customer relationship/social media and networking applications and use of today. (I also offer it as tongue-in-cheek proof that at least once in twenty years, my predictions have been accurate!
)
In a much shorter span of time, due largely to the rapidity with which we can today adopt and reject different technologies and communications metaphors, I believe that 2010 will bring us some readjustment to the adoption and application of many of the social media and networking solutions available. Businesses, their customers and various audiences, and the technology vendors that support our ability to relate have behaved like the proverbial children in a candy store as they deploy ways of internetworking in their customer relationship, sales and marketing channels. We have been preaching that adopting and deploying social media and networking applications should be informed by an integrated marketing/sales/customer relations strategy; we should also have been coaching ourselves and our consumer-friends to do the same. Today, faced with multiple devices and applications on each, all similarly poised to serve my communications needs and curiosity, I see 2010 as the year that some consolidation, re-prioritization, and merger/acquisition will take place due to the constraints of bandwidth, the natural fall-out of the success and failure of businesses who have quickly cobbled together competitive applications, and the maturity of our adoption of the same both in our professional and personal capacities. With no further ado, but some nervous wincing, I offer the following general and some specific predictions for 2010:
General Trends:
1. Organizations who have been dabbling their toes in social media channels for customer outreach will either be the best practice model or retract their offerings completely. The speed with which our effectiveness in communicating using these channels is judged by our audience dictates that their is very little-time to privately fine-tune our approach. Missteps are instantly reported and best practices lauded. We have been cautioning our clients to strategize first; “Tweet” last and those that have adopted this approach are much more successful, even as they adjust it, than those who jumped on the Twitter, Facebook Page, blog, etc. bandwagon only to find they had little to say or had not developed the infrastructure to support their efforts. I have been personally “testing” and rating the efforts of some companies in the telecommunications, high-tech, and consumer products verticals and will continue to do so. Even in the past year, the gap between success and failure has been very black and white. Those that dabbled without a transparent, honest and open approach to soliciting participation and feedback have dramatically reduced their presence or are gone; those that set strategy and have flexibly incorporated the feedback of their participants are still going strong. Most importantly as is mentioned in this article, “real time is not fast enough”: 4 Social Media Trends for Business in 2010 (pamorama.net)
2. A leader in social media measurements and metrics WILL emerge (this may be definitely in the wishful thinking category). We have played with a number of applications in an attempt to measure our own effectiveness in our social media outreach and our clients and colleagues have certainly expressed this as their biggest challenge and need for 2010. A plethora of applications and practices have evolved over the past year, but no one seems to have demonstrated the ability to provide service to both the SMB and large business marketplace. VisibleTechnologies, Radian6, and ViralHeat all offer a suite of solutions that seem to provide the breadth of measurement for which many have clamored, but we think that a vendor that has the benchstrength of SEO and traditional collateral metrics blended with the ability to monitor the pulse of sentiments expressed in our emerging channels will be a front-runner. Another key success factor will be their ability to offer a tiered-pricing structure that is accessible to the smaller business.
3. Bandwidth issues will force resolution. It is clear that the FCC is facing some enormous challenges in the spectrum arena, pushed by our adoption of mobile applications and our increasingly untethered approach to communication and conversation. The “but of course” piece of this prediction is that the FCC will make a decision about alternative and additional sources of spectrum (for those of you inclined to take a look at the history, see this study: http://www.reg-markets.org/admin/authorpdfs/redirect-safely.php?fname=../pdffiles/working_01_021075290780.pdf The more intuitive piece is that our limited bandwidth and the growing frustration of consumers and business mobile application users must drive our own strategic thinking and prioritation regarding use of solutions that blend the best of our CRM, SFA, and social networking tools on our mobile devices. Those applications that offer the best-of-breed that shares a piece of all of these will certainly emerge as icons on my Blackberry.
4. Congress will consider additional privacy legislation. Knowledge service provision is the polite term for the complex data-mining that both corporations and individuals practice as conduct predictive analyses of our consumers’ and networks behaviors and attributes (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_market). Consumers concern for the privacy of their on-line personas (which seems paradoxical) will drive politicians at the local, state, and federal levels to contemplate additional protective measures, http://www.cedmagazine.com/News-Congress-online-privacy-legislation-061909.aspx. Most importantly, this concern of our constituents and attention of politicians should drive us as businesses to be ever more vigilant in our transparency and honest expression of our internetworking intentions, lest we suffer backlash from our audience and failure of our attempts long before legislation steps in.
To return to my opening anecdotal story, the plethora of choices that face us as businesses and consumers and the speed with which our internetworking communications are judged and evaluated will drive a much faster shift in applications provision, vendor consolidation and acquisition, and availability of broad content creation, publishing and measurements suites than we experienced post-divestiture. If a single-bill and customer contact 800 number drove a return to a single telecommunications provider over a ten year period, shrink that consumer reaction and vendor response time metphor by 1/10th and you will understand the core of our predictions for 2010. Perhaps a more concrete synthesis of this post is provided by my “Going Out On A Limb” prediction for 2010:
Twitter will be acquired by ?. The names of the players may change, but my thinking is that in Twitter we have found a truly facile, effective and immediate channel for communicating with a very diverse and huge potential audience. The service and its users are self-regulating and successful users are quickly noted and its open approach to associated applications has resulted in a myriad of options for uploading content, measuring folowers, RT’s, etc. We think that an acquistion by a company who has the content creation, editing, and publishing benchstrength, combined with an understanding of social media and networking measurement challenges will purchase Twitter and embed the channel with some native content and measurement utilities. The odds-makers are predicting that this will be Microsoft, but we are thinking that the acquirer may be someone that is not in the search engine/networking/social media space but a more traditional collateral application company. The debate at Cubed Consulting continues as to who this might be but we’d love for your to weigh in with your names!
Related articles by Zemanta
- Should Private Be the Default on the Internet? [Reader Poll] (lifehacker.com)
- EU firing privacy shots across bows….. (broadstuff.com)
- 4 Social Media Trends for Business in 2010 (pamorama.net)
- Measuring social media (theequitykicker.com)
Understand International Variances in your Customer Surveys
Posted by Jimmy Maher in Customer Experience, Customer Marketing, Integrated Marketing Strategy on June 23rd, 2009
One of the challenges I have struggled with when interpreting customer survey results is understanding why some countries give lower scores than others on the same questions – in particular in relation to product performance, which should be the same for all regions. Most global companies divide the world into the following regions – NASA (North and South America), EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) and APAC (Asia-Pacific Region). I have observed that on the same survey, the NASA region will score highest, followed by EMEA, followed by APAC. In one instance, the NASA based support management assumed that this indicated that they were doing a better job and there was pressure applied to the other regions support teams to close the gap. Having worked in both NASA and EMEA based service organizations, I have suspected that variances in results might be culture related. Furthermore, if I took the APAC results for a particular survey and looked only at results for Australia and New Zealand, these closely matched NASA results – suggesting that the APAC support team was doing as good a job as their NASA counterparts.
Recently, I discovered the work of Professor Geert Hofstede who has conducted ground-breaking studies of cultural differences. Analyzing a large data base of employee values scores collected by IBM between 1967 and 1973 covering more than 70 countries, Prof. Hofstede developed a Framework for Assessing Culture that identifies five dimensions of culture that can impact and predict behavior.
Wikipedia summarizes the five dimensions as follows …
- Low vs. High Power Distance – the extent to which the less powerful members of institutions and organizations expect and accept that power is distributed unequally. Low power distance (e.g. Austria, Australia, Denmark, New Zealand) expect and accept power relations that are more consultative or democratic. People relate to one another more as equals regardless of formal positions. Subordinates are more comfortable with and demand the right to contribute to and critique the decision making of those in power. In High power distance countries (e.g. Malaysia), less powerful accept power relations that are more autocratic and paternalistic. Subordinates acknowledge the power of others simply based on where they are situated in certain formal, hierarchical positions. As such, the Power Distance Index Hofstede defines does not reflect an objective difference in power distribution, but rather the way people perceive power differences. In Europe, Power Distance tends to be lower in Northern countries and higher in Southern and Eastern parts. There seems to be an admittedly disputable correlation with predominant religions.
- Individualism vs. collectivism – individualism is contrasted with collectivism, and refers to the extent to which people are expected to stand up for themselves and to choose their own affiliations, or alternatively act predominantly as a member of a life-long group or organization. Latin American cultures rank among the most collectivist in this category, while Anglo countries such as the U.S.A., Great Britain and Australia are the most individualistic cultures.
- Masculinity vs. femininity – refers to the value placed on traditionally male or female values (as understood in most Western cultures). So called ‘masculine’ cultures value competitiveness, assertiveness, ambition, and the accumulation of wealth and material possessions, whereas feminine cultures place more value on relationships and quality of life. Japan is considered by Hofstede to be the most “masculine” culture (replaced by Slovakia in a later study), Sweden the most “feminine.” Anglo cultures are moderately masculine. As a result of the taboo on sexuality in many cultures, particularly masculine ones, and because of the obvious gender generalizations implied by Hofstede’s terminology, this dimension is often renamed by users of Hofstede’s work, e.g. to Quantity of Life vs. Quality of Life. Another reading of the same dimension holds that in ‘M’ cultures, the differences between gender roles are more dramatic and less fluid than in ‘F’ cultures
- Uncertainty avoidance – reflects the extent to which members of a society attempt to cope with anxiety by minimizing uncertainty. Cultures that scored high in uncertainty avoidance prefer rules (e.g. about religion and food) and structured circumstances, and employees tend to remain longer with their present employer. Mediterranean cultures, Latin America, and Japan rank the highest in this category.
Michael Harris Bond and his collaborators subsequently found a fifth dimension which was initially called Confucian dynamism. Hofstede later incorporated this into his framework as:
- Long vs. short term orientation – describes a society’s “time horizon,” or the importance attached to the future versus the past and present. In long term oriented societies, values include persistence (perseverance), ordering relationships by status, thrift, and having a sense of shame; in short term oriented societies, values include normative statements, personal steadiness and stability, protecting ones face, respect for tradition, and reciprocation of greetings, favors, and gifts. China, Japan and the Asian countries score especially high (long-term) here, with Western nations scoring rather low (short-term) and many of the less developed nations very low; China scored highest and Pakistan lowest.
The scores on the dimensions are available at Hofstede’s website.
In summary, although not without it’s detractors, Hofstede’s work remains the most exhaustive and scientific study of cultural differences to date. It presents compelling evidence that an individuals behavior is influenced by their cultural background and provides a predictive model based on the research. I have observed a similarity in survey responses from countries scoring high on the individualism/collectivism dimension. I will certainly be leveraging Hofstedes work in future surveys to determine if this observation continues to hold true.
The key takeaways for customer experience and customer support managers are …
- Survey results should not be used to compare performance across geographic boundaries, without taking into account the cultural background of the respondent.
- Compare single country results to known benchmarks, if possible.
- Survey frequently to capture trends. Trending will give you a reliable indication of your organizations performance over time.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Announcing the 2009 Google Online Marketing Challenge winners (googleblog.blogspot.com)
SAP UK Study finds that Customer Engagement is Key to Surviving Recession
Posted by Jimmy Maher in Customer Experience, Customer Marketing, Integrated Marketing Strategy on May 27th, 2009
The following appeared in an article posted at …
http://tinyurl.com/qrmxru
“Recent research by software provider SAP UK found that over 50 per cent of respondents are looking at a number of different technology channels to increase revenue.
A similar amount also claimed that focusing on customer engagement will be the key driver to surviving the downturn. “
Like most organizations, your company is likely engaging your customers through multiple channels, formal and informal, across different departments. This can cause the customer experience to be erratic and disjointed. Remember that the customer does not view your company as a collection of individuals or siloed departments, but very likely experiences your organization that way. Great customer experience requires a company wide strategy for all customer touchpoints. Based on the findings by SAP UK, many organizations are realizing this.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Using Social Media to Engage Customers and Partners in Co-Creating Your Brand (socialmediatoday.com)
- Lewis Green: Businesses Will Take Social Media to the Bank (mpdailyfix.com)

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=41457980-b03a-46c7-8e9d-e318ec72f437)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=ad810d61-fdba-4ef0-85b2-ecde4ef67b1c)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=bda049ba-0145-4cc4-9541-2be03df4308b)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=33101bc6-9630-428b-bd80-e7c298f8cede)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=9f0fae6e-0236-4b98-b092-67e2b57f0ea6)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=06fa959c-122a-45f6-8d8d-db7ff7b34c22)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=c30639c3-27dc-4a8b-806c-25a1ecca54ba)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=a4f886e2-9aa9-41ab-a66b-c1d48ce9fc9d)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=cd197d33-9486-40f8-813b-71ac25570d13)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=5e699e20-450b-4619-84e2-9ab2187af907)